Showing posts with label Coupe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coupe. Show all posts

Monday, July 30, 2007

2008 Aston Martin Rapide

2008 Aston Martin Rapide

At the 2006 Detroit auto show, Aston Martin stunned the gathered crowd with a breathtakingly beautiful four-door styling exercise called the Rapide. Named for the legendary late-1930s Lagonda flagship engineered by W. O. Bentley, the Rapide is the second four-door Aston project initiated under Ford ownership. The first, the 1993 Lagonda Vignale show car, was designed by Ghia and later mothballed. The Rapide, however, is all set for production in 2008, just ahead of its direct rival, the Porsche Panamera. We drove the concept car in Gaydon, England.

"Our goal was to make the most beautiful four-door car in the world," says design director Marek Reichman. The team succeeded from an aesthetic point of view, but the rear-seat packaging is unacceptable. Although the wheelbase was stretched from the DB9’s 107.9 inches to 117.7 inches, which matches that of the standard Lincoln Town Car, tall passengers will find it very difficult to squeeze through the narrow aperture defined by the low roofline and the restricted door opening. "The rear doors will swing open much farther in the production car," promises Reichman. "Slimmer seats will provide more legroom, and we may even alter the platform to lower the hip point, but that would require a $3 million investment." We say it would be worth it. The rear seats are beautifully sculpted, and we’d like to be able to sit in them.

2008 Aston Martin Rapide Because it's a show car, the Rapide is replete with glitzy features such as power-folding rear seatbacks, a collapsible chessboard, and a bar with crystal champagne flutes. The four leather-clad bucket seats are separated by a substantial full-length center console, which eats up precious rear legroom. We hope Aston keeps the spacious, beautifully finished cargo deck, the practical liftgate, and the variable-tint polycarbonate roof. At the push of a button, the electrochromatic roof changes the in-cab atmosphere from airy to moody. The interior trim is equally impressive, with skillfully chosen matte poplar accents, blue sharkskin, and green-beige saddle leather.

2008 Aston Martin Rapide The shiny chrome controls grouped around the custom Jaeger-LeCoultre clock are a bit over the top, but we're drawn to the starter button, which fires the 5.9-liter V-12. It's the same engine as in the DB9 but with its output bumped from 450 to 480 hp. Here, unfortunately, the mighty V-12 is castrated—it's limited to 4000 rpm. Mercifully, the car's character remains intact, and the engine's beautiful noise is further accentuated by large-diameter tailpipes and a pair of intake louvers reminiscent of the DBR9 race car’s.

Derived from the DB9 platform, the Rapide will take relatively little investment and time to complete its journey from show car to production model. If anything, the four-door treatment enhances the presence and beauty of the coupe's form language. How much will the newcomer cost? We hope that the narrow price gap between the $161,100 DB9 coupe and the $174,100 DB9 Volante (convertible) will accommodate a third model. If money were no object, would we join a queue to be guaranteed early delivery? Absolutely—if Aston can fix the packaging problem without altering the Rapide's elegant shape. If not, then forget it. Or rethink the marketing gambit and call the Rapide what it is: a four-door sport coupe.

More...

Read More...

Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera

Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera

What's so special about this evil-looking bit of kit?

It's a harder, faster and lighter Lamborghini Gallardo, a kind of pre-emptive strike against the Ferrari F430 Challenge Stradale due for launch next year. Shorn of its hi-fi and fitted with thinner glass and more carbonfibre and less metal, the Superleggera weighs 1330kg, a soild 100kg less than the standard Gallardo.

Run me through the changes

Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera First there's the carbon. It's everywhere: on the new engine cover and rear wing, the sill extensions and the door mirrors. Then there's the new multi-spoke 19-inch alloys, bucket seats and four point harnesses.

Sadly the engine's pretty much untouched, but tweaks to the inlet and exhaust system have liberated an extra 10bhp for a 530bhp total, dropping the 0-62mph time from 4.0 to 3.8sec. The 197mph top speed is the same as the standard car's though.

It's also four-wheel drive, just like the standard car. Lamborghini could have chopped another easy 100kg out by making it rear-drive only but according to R&D boss Maurizio Reggiani, four-wheel drive is part of a Lambo's DNA.

So is this a new benchmark in hardcore supercars or a cynical marketing excercise?

Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera Bit of both really. On paper, a 100kg weight saving and a 10bhp increase in power don't sound likely to make an enormously different driving experience. But there is a tangible difference between this and the regular Gallardo - providing you're prepared to spank every last drop of performance form the sticky rubber and 5.0-litre V10.

The sportier dampers are a welcome modification on the track where poise, roadholding and control are instrumental for shaving off tenths here and there. On fresh tyres, the Superleggera must be pure bliss, but even on used rubber the car is flat and amazingly stable. Despite the tail-friendly 30:70 torque split, you experience the full handling spectrum from determined understeer to radical oversteer.

Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera To get the best out of the Superleggera, you hit the sport button for even quicker upshifts from the e-gear transmission and a more lurid ESP calibration. You can turn in late and brutally abruptly, Alonso-style. And you can brake past the point of no return and will still be reeled in unscathed, providing you've left the ESP switched on. Switch it out and there's a different story to be told. You need to be very quick to catch any slide that gets out of hand.

Verdict

On the road, the Superleggera is noisier and louder than the standard car and only really begins to shine at the sort of speeds most drivers will never see away from the circuit. Added to that it's significantly more expensive, commanding a £22k premium over the £123k needed to secure a regular Gallardo.

So is it worth it? Probably not in cold, hard objective terms. But when has common sense ever been a factor when buying a supercar? If you want to grin so much your face aches, you need to get yourself a Superleggera.

Need to know: Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera

How much? £145k (est)
On sale in UK: May 2007
Engine: 4961cc 40v V10, 520bhp@7800rpm, 376lb ft@4500rpm
Transmission: Six-speed semi-auto, four-wheel drive
Performance: 3.8sec 0-62mph, 197mph
How heavy/made of? 1330kg/aluminium, carbonfibre
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4300/1900/1165
Other models in the range: Gallardo, Roadster
Or try a... Porsche 911 GT3 RS,Ferrari F430,Aston Martin Vantage N24

More...

Read More...

New Nissan 350Z

New Nissan 350Z

The 2007 350Z looks the same as the old one, doesn’t it?

If you look carefully there’s a bulge in the bonnet and therein lies the story. The new-for-2007 350Z gets an engine that’s 80% new – and 8mm higher. Hence the purposeful swelling on the bonnet. The charismatic 3.5-litre V6 gets longer con rods, a wider range of operation for the variable valve timing and equal length exhaust manifolds. For the first time too, there are dual intake manifolds. The compression ratio is up from 10.3 to 10.6 to 1, all of which allows the new unit to produce 309bhp. It’s what Nissan’s sports car always needed.

I’ve heard that the engine started life as a Renault unit

New Nissan 350Z So the story goes. In reality this V6, in 2.5 and 3-litre guise, gestated in the infinitely forgettable Maxima QX and was then adopted by Renault in 3.5-litre form for the oddball Vel Satis and Avantime. In the 350Z it started life in 2003 with 276bhp, which then rose to 296bhp in its 2006 iteration. Now its got 309bhp – a useful 33bhp hike over the original, but only 13bhp more than the 2006 model.

Sounds like a pretty radical and expensive exercise for a mere 4% gain in power

New Nissan 350Z Yes, quite. Except in a way all this is correcting some of the shortcomings of the 296bhp engine. Although the rev limit rose from 6500rpm in the original to 7000rpm, there was a penalty in the peakier torque curve. The new 2007 unit may rev even higher - to a howling 7500rpm – but the torque graph is flatter once more and idling is smoother. That annoying vibration through the gearlever is now modulated, but one thing that Nissan has not changed is the urgent, determined mechanical growl of the engine that is so enticing throughout the rev range.

And the improvement in performance?

New Nissan 350Z A tenth off the 0-62mph time, now 5.7 seconds, and the same limited 155mph top speed. Hardly even pub bragging rights let alone perceptible away from the lights. But Nissan claims driveability is slightly improved with the torque improvements. We were honestly hard pushed to tell the difference, and so was someone who lives with an original 276bhp 350Z on a daily basis. But hey, any improvements should be welcomed for it keeps the 350Z story on the boil, and there’s certainly no need for the Nissan to be consigned to the bin in favour of a new contender.

And the 350Z story is…

New Nissan 350Z The same as ever. It a damn fine sports car. The fact it’s quick goes without saying, but it’s visceral element elevates it to a higher level. The steering is tactile and accurate, with power assistance falling off as the speed rises to increase road feel. There’s a short-shift change that needs a firm hand but then snicks rapidly to the next ratio, all eased by the possibility of a flatteringly easy heel and toe blip on the down change. And it handles pretty neutrally too, the enormous depths of grip finally giving way to understeer. Of course you can play with the stability system switched out but it’s hardly intrusive. And every mile is accompanied by that distinctive 350Z exhaust burble.

But the Boxster is still better, right?

New Nissan 350Z That’s a tricky one. The Boxster has more chassis finesse and is rather more comfortable and precise. On the other hand the 350Z’s real rival, the Cayman, needs Porsche’s active suspension management option if you are to keep your fillings in place. Neither Porsche manages to better the Nissan’s levels of excitement, and that’s surely what true sports car driving is all about. The 350Z is a genuinely thrilling machine, coupling ample power with that old 911 feeling of wondering quite how hard you dare push the boundaries before it bites back.

Verdict

New Nissan 350Z So the 350Z is a car for real men then? If you insist, yes it is. It has the right credentials in terms of its power plant, the arguably perfect 53:47 weight distribution (a bit more weight in the nose can help stability in bumpy corners) and a set of beefy Brembos. It’s also something of a bargain. Prices are up just £300 over the earlier car, which means that the coupe kicks off at £26,795 and the roadster £28,295. Even with the essential GT Pack (leather, Bose sounds and cruise control) plus satnav you are still well short of entry-level Porsche money. But you really don’t need to get into that Nissan versus Porsche argument at all. The 350Z still stands up a brilliant sports car. No compromise necessary.

Need to Know: New Nissan 350Z

How much? £26,795
On sale in the UK: May 2007
Engine: 3498cc V6, 309bhp @ 6800rpm, 264lb ft @ 4800rpm
Transmission: Six-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Performance: 5.7sec 0-62mph, 155mph, 24.1mpg, 280g/km CO2
How heavy/made of? 1532kg/steel
How big? (length/ width/ height in mm)? 4315/1815/1325
Other models in the range: 350Z Roadster
Or try a... Audi TT, BMW Z Coupe, Mazda RX-8, Porsche Cayman

More...

Read More...

Lotus Exige 265E

Lotus Exige 265E

It looks like a slightly more colourful Exige - what's the story?

This is the Exige 265E - the fastest ever Exige and the first bio-ethanol Lotus. The digits 265 denote the 265PS power output, or 261bhp in old money – up 46bhp over the standard car. The 'E' informs people that this car runs on ethanol, alcohol made from the fermentation of crops, mixed with petrol. Using this greener fuel results in a claimed 70 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.

The Exige 265E is a development prototype created by Lotus Engineering, the Norfolk firm's fiendishly clever consultancy arm. In only five weeks between July and August 2006, its engineers completely re-engineered the Toyota engine powering the standard Exige S to run on the wheat-derived fuel.

The result is the fastest road-legal bio-ethanol car (and the fastest Exige) ever built. Performance is sensational - 0-60mph flashes up in only 3.88 seconds before running out of puff at a mind bending 158mph. Who says being green is boring?

Slow down future boy! Surely this is the stuff of 2060 - not 2006...

Lotus Exige 265E Far from it. The technology to make all this possible is remarkably low-tech. The basic aluminium block (built for Toyota by Yamaha) is exactly the same as that fitted to the Exige S. The supercharger and intercooler combination is tweaked slightly to cope with the increase in power and the ECU has been remapped for the new fuel mix.

These tweaks do nothing to make the Exige faster, the extra power is entirely down to the fuel. Ethanol burns more efficiently than conventional petrol thanks to the extra oxygen atom attached to the ethanol alcohol molecule in its makeup. In English this means the combustion process is more effective and more power can be produced.

Brilliant! So why aren't we all driving them?

Lotus Exige 265E You and I are the main hurdle. Buyers are only going to opt for the new fuel, sold as E85 (85 percent ethanol, 15 percent petrol), if it's both readily available and substantially cheaper than conventional petrol or diesel. For this to happen the government needs to truly commit to the fuel and encourage the creation of a bio-ethanol fuel station network. Currently the Morrisons Group is the only major supplier of the fuel with pumps dotted around Norfolk and Somerset.

The technology needs to be proven too. For Lotus this means a substantial investment in testing and productionising the new, higher-output ethanol-powered engine. For now, Lotus claims it won't take the project further, but its manufacturer clients surely will. And surely a green Lotus would then follow...

So what’s it like to drive?

Lotus Exige 265E As you'd expect it's utterly insane but - like the standard car - very useable. The Exige weighs only 930kg. There's no build up, no gradual gathering of speed - the performance is instant and borderline vicious. Your neck snaps back as the supercharger kicks in to take the engine right up to the 8200rpm redline. Combined with a slick, precise six-speed gearbox and limpet-like grip, the Exige is a devastating point to point machine. The performance is incredibly easy to exploit thanks to an extra dollop of torque supplied by the ethanol fuel - much more so than the standard car. Floor the accelerator in any gear and the Exige punches hard and simply never lets up.

As with any other Exige the 265E is easy to drive - the steering's heavy but precise, the brakes possess serious bite and the damping is near perfectly judged to offer both comfort and control. It might be noisy and difficult to get into but there are few cars - at any price - that offer a better driving experience down a twisty road.

What's the flipside of ethanol?

Lotus Exige 265E Apart from the obvious lack of ethanol stations in the UK there are more fundamental problems. Ethanol has less stored energy per unit volume than traditional gasoline. This means economy suffers and you need to stop more often for fuel. And that reduced inefficicency means more CO2 emissions. The reason Lotus claims a 70 percent reduction is because the crops extract carbon dioxide from the atmosphere before they are turned into fuel, creating a net saving in overall emissions.

Lotus hopes to convert the Exige 265E test car to be able to run on conventional petrol, bio-methanol or bio-butanol depending on availability. 5 of 7

Verdict

Lotus Exige 265E The Exige 265E is quicker than a Ferrari F430 yet produces less CO2 than a Ford Focus. With it, Lotus has injected some glamour and excitement into the alternative fuels debate, but what enthusiasts need is a production car that's an alternative to the worthy Toyota Prius. Hopefully the government and fuel suppliers will totally embrace biofuels, kick-starting demand and making thrilling green cars like the Exige 265E a commercial reality.

Need to know: Lotus Exige 265E

Price: Not on sale
On sale in the UK: N/A
Engine: 1796cc, 4cyl, 265bhp @ 7800rpm, 181lb ft @ 5500rpm
Transmission: six-speed manual, rear wheel drive
Performance: 0-62mph in 4.0secs, 158mph, 25mpg (est), 151g/km CO2 (est)
How heavy/made of? 930kg / aluminium
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 3797/1727/1163
Other models in the range: Exige R, S
Or try a... Caterham CSR 260,Ariel Atom,Porsche Cayman

More...

Read More...

Sunday, July 29, 2007

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition

Are you telling me this beast has 722bhp under the bonnet?

Not quite. The 722 – or the Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition to quote its full name – is a limited run of tweaked SLRs, named after the Mercedes 300 SLR that British racing legend Stirling Moss and his co-driver Dennis Jenkinson drove to victory in the 1955 Mille Miglia race from Brescia to Rome and back.

The number actually refers to the time - 07:22am - that they started the grueling 1000-mile race, and they completed it at a record-breaking average speed of 100mph.

Hmm. This has the fishy whiff of marketing about it.

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition You could well be right. SLR sales have never lived up to Mercedes’ expectations, and special edition models with more power, honed dynamics and greater driver engagement are always a sharp hook with which to go out and snag some more buyers. If it works for Porsche…

The left-hand-drive 722 series will be limited to 150 models worldwide, and will cost around £350,000 depending on the Sterling-Euro exchange rate. Mercedes opened up its order books to prospective buyers when the 722 was unveiled at the Paris Motor Show last September. All UK-bound 722s have already been snapped up.

So what’s new?

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition Well, for an extra £32,500 over the standard SLR you get more power and less weight. Which is a good place to start. Recalibrating the hand-built 5.5-litre supercharged V8 engine’s electronic black box has pushed output to 650bhp at 6500rpm and 605lb ft at 4000rpm – that’s 24bhp and 30lb ft more than a standard SLR.

The five-speed paddle-shift automatic transmission and its gearing remain unchanged, but you do get even more carbonfibre, with a new front splitter and rear diffuser, resulting in a 44kg drop in weight to a still super-size-me 1724kg.

That’s it?

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition Not quite. The steering has been tweaked, the suspension uprated, the ride height dropped, each corner fitted with lightweight alloy wheels to reduce unsprung weight, ceramic brakes are fitted, and the aerodynamics have been upgraded.

Inside you get red stitching on the Alcantara-wrapped bucket seats and suede–covered steering wheel, red-ringed instruments and redesigned aluminium shift paddles. Oh, and a tacky 722 plaque on the centre console that would shame a Christmas cracker goody. In total, over 300 components have been enhanced or replaced.

I’m guessing it’s pretty brisk.

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition It’s expletive-inducingly quick. Imagine strapping a jet engine on full afterburner to your back and you’ll get the idea. The 722 claws its way up to 100mph with the kind of vicious, neck-straining acceleration that makes a BMW M5 or Porsche 911 feel like a milk float with a flat battery.

There’s no pause or slowing up of that pulverising acceleration either – that hammering V8 engine just keeps ripping through to its 7000rpm redline, dropping into a higher gear and winding the speedometer needle closer to its maximum velocity.

But is it happy at these speeds?

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition It feels made for them – stable, solid and planted. That carbonfibre front lip almost doubles front downforce at speed, the rear diffuser has been revised to suck the tail down on to the tarmac, and the airbrake now lifts to a more acute angle to boost rear-end stability under extreme braking.

All of which means winding the 722 up to its 210mph top speed is simply a matter of finding a long straight road and holding the comically large steering wheel straight. A bit easier than the terrifying speeds managed by Moss and Jenks in 1955 (see pic above).

So it’s fast, but what about the brakes?

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition Brilliant and awful in the same breath. The 722 is fitted with vast 390mm carbonfibre-reinforced ceramic brake discs complete with red calipers, supplied by Brembo. While the Sensotronic brake-by-wire setup has absolutely no problem in hauling the 722 back down from go-directly-to-jail speeds with the lightest brush of the floor-mounted pedal, they are frustratingly difficult to modulate; the pedal feels wooden and smooth deceleration is almost an impossibility.

So it’s good in a straight line. What about corners?

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition Here’s where the 722 falls apart. It’s the steering that’s to blame. Despite being razor-sharp and accurate, it never feels anything but dead. You’re given very little idea of what the front wheels are doing – not so cool in a car that can whip up to three times the national limit in a few minutes.

Throw in a chassis that feels stiff but oddly inert and you’re left driving a very one-dimensional car. Which is a crying shame given the killer performance of its engine and brakes.

Verdict

Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition The 722 perfectly illustrates the point that there’s more to a supercar than earth-shattering speed. You need tactility and communication, emotion and charisma – qualities the 722 is sadly bereft of.

A Ferrari 599 may not match the SLR’s sledgehammer performance, but its far higher level of driver engagement is far more appealing than a few saved tenths of a second over a sweaty-palmed Alpine pass. Ditto a Porsche 911 Turbo. Both cheaper to buy and better to drive - salt in the 722’s wounds that’s really going to sting.

Need to Know: Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR 722 Edition

How much? £350,000
On sale in the UK: 2007
Engine: 5439cc, 20v, supercharged V8, 650bhp @ 6500rpm, 590lb ft @ 4000rpm
Transmission: Five-speed paddle-shift, rear wheel drive
Performance: 0-60mph 3.6.seconds, 210mph, 14.5mpg
How heavy/made of? 1724kg/carbonfibre, aluminium
How big (length/ width/ height in mm)? 4656/1908/1251
Other models in the range: SLR
Or try a... Ferrari 599,Porsche 911 Turbo,Koenigsegg CCX

More...

Read More...

Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG

Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG

Black Series? Sounds posh and a little edgy. What's all that about then?

AMG groups its cars into five divisions. The Black Series machines are second only to the borderline psychotic and super-expensive Signature Series (i.e. CLK DTM) cars in the line-up.

Black Series cars are stripped out, track focused and expensive (just like the Signature Series cars then) and this particular weapon is the second MB car to receive the Black treatment. A permanent hard top SLK 55 AMG with a carbon roof was the first.

So what's special about this CLK Black?

Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG If you can ignore the fact that the Signature and Black Series cars appear to share a strangely similar philosophy, the CLK Black's spec is as mouthwatering as its price is eye-watering (around £100,000). AMG takes the competent but bland CLK 63 AMG Coupe and does what it probably wanted to do to the car to start with: strip it out, tune it up, fit track-orientated suspension and brakes and unleash a car that feels as tight and as trick as anything it has ever built.

Aside from the F1 safety car-alike bodywork with its assorted scoops, flips and wings, the CLK 63 Black has a not-inconsiderable 507bhp – 26bhp up on the standard model – from its 6.3-litre, naturally aspirated, mainly handbuilt V8.

This is a phenomenal engine; utterly smooth but revvy and angry and easily a match for BMW’s M Power V10. The Black gets a tuned exhaust system, which not only releases extra horses from the motor but also a barrage of bangs, pops, growls and grumbles.

Other mods to this all-aluminium engine include a reprogrammed ECU and a tuned intake system while those 507 gee-gees gallop to the rear wheels via AMG's Speedshift seven-speed auto (there's no manual option) with a shorter final drive ratio. There's also a limited-slip diff that feels suitably sticky on the track.

Crikey. Sounds fast...

Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG Oh yes. The Black is 0.3 seconds quicker to 60mph than the standard CLK 63 AMG, hitting the magic six-oh in just under 4.3 seconds. Top speed is limited to 188mph.

That’s not a huge outright performance advantage over the standard CLK 63 (especially when you remember it costs approximately £10,000 per tenth of a second saved to 60mph…), but where the Black Series really scores is on the track.

On the track? Go on then, tell us what it’s like

Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG Well, we drove it on the track and the road and initial impressions were good. Very good. The front seats (the only seats in the car) grab you tightly, the exhaust note is barking mad and the whole car feels brilliantly stiff and pure of purpose. The new adjustable coilover suspension delivered a surprisingly comfortable ride, and the composite brake discs (thicker on this Black version) provided massive braking performance and great feel.

On track, the circuit-focused Pirelli P Zero Corsas and coilover suspension set-up provided strong, consistent grip while the handling was nicely neutral and exploitable. With such a beefy engine up front, understeer came first but a few laps with Mercedes racing legend (and former DTM champ) Klaus Ludwig demonstrated the best way to drive the car – from the rear. A couple of lifts or stabs on the brakes to unsettle the car way before the apex, then loads of right-foot to throttle-steer the car all the way through the corner. Brilliant.

Sound great. Surely it wasn't all good?

Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG Well, on the road the seven-speed 'box with paddle shift worked well enough, but on the track there's little doubt a manual gearbox would provide greater satisfaction. If this car is about track thrills, then the lack of a manual option is a strange one – after all you can't imagine Porsche building an auto-only GT3, can you?

Also, someone at AMG has once again confused steering weight for steering feel.

Ah, the sublime Porsche GT3? How does it compare?

Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG Very favourably in terms of outright pace and price, but the Porsche is unquestionably the better car. The CLK 63 Black Series is intriguing, suitably bonkers and surprisingly capable – but at close to £100K, it is neither as focused as a GT3 nor as capable on the road as the 911 Turbo. That's not to say this isn't a good car, merely that its up against some incredible competition.

The CLK 63 Black Series has massive appeal – it’s rare, it’s fast, it’s fun and it is as charismatic as any Merc I’ve driven. But £100,000! Phew.

Need to know: Mercedes-Benz CLK Black AMG

How much? TBA (approx. £100,000)
On sale in UK: June 2007
Engine: 6208cc V8, 507bhp @ 6800rpm, 464lb ft @ 5250rpm
Transmission: Seven-speed automatic with paddle-shift, rear-wheel drive
Performance: 4.3sec 0-62mph, 188mph (limited)
How heavy/made of? 1760kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4657/1833/1365
Other models in the range: SLK Black Series
Or try a... Porsche 911 GT3 RS,Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera,Aston Martin Vantage N24

More...

Read More...

Mercedes CL65 AMG

Mercedes CL65 AMG

Looks like a bit of a beast. Is this another warp-enabled starship from AMG?

Mercedes CL65 AMG Looks like a bit of a beast. Is this another warp-enabled starship from AMG? Yep. This is Mercedes’ big CL-class coupe fitted with AMG’s ballistic 6.0-litre V12 bi-turbo engine and a bunch of go-faster, look-smarter goodies.

It’s also the flagship model in the AMG range, which makes it the quickest and costliest Mercedes this side of the SLR.

And speaking of the McLaren-badged wunder-Merc, the SLR has just 14bhp more than the CL65 and is only 0.6sec quicker to 60mph. The CL undercuts the SLR by over £150,000 too. Interesting…

That’s massive performance then. But is it usable? Does it need wheelie bars?

Mercedes CL65 AMG Well, 612bhp is an ungentlemanly amount of power. Therefore the Merc’s ESP and traction control systems act like a platoon of border guards between the marauding engine and the quivering rear wheels.

Credit to the AMG and Mercedes engineers though; the ESP and traction control systems work well. The car is insanely fast in a straight line and combined with a nicely resolved Active Body Control system handles its ungodly girth (2240kg) with a surprising amount of finesse.

You’re not trying to convince us that this is a proper driver’s car, are you?

Mercedes CL65 AMG Never. It’s too heavy, the steering is dead and no amount of electronic trickery can compensate for genuine feel.

However, the CL65 is the closest you’ll get to Lear Jet levels of cross-country pace without needing an aircraft licence. It simply chews fast A-roads and motorways and spits you out at the other end feeling fresh and comfortable.

It is a cruiser of the highest calibre; the seats cradle you softly while heating (or cooling) your botty, the radar-enabled Distronic Plus cruise control works brilliantly at maintaining speed and distance and the overall interior ambience is cutting-edge hi-fi slick. Only the embarrassingly tacky IWC-design analogue clock lets the cabin down.

A surprisingly likeable car then, despite its visual arrogance and earth-chomping engine?

Mercedes CL65 AMG Yes. The CL65 is a beguiling mix of unhinged hooliganism and private members club chic - but it’s not all roses. A car of this price, pace and engineering excellence is never going to disappoint the rational side of the brain – but if you want soul with your pace and engineering excellence, look elsewhere.

The CL65 leaves you cold. It impresses rather than seduces, and even if you’ve just embarrassed a 911 Turbo owner, crossed a continent in less than a day or let the car drive for you for over 200 miles, you find it hard to fall for it.

The CL65 is another one of those mighty achievements from Mercedes, but it lacks a Bentley’s heart or indeed an Aston Martin’s beauty.

Hang on a second though, forget all this talk of Bentley and Aston Martin; isn’t there an enemy within?

Mercedes CL65 AMG Yes. And this is where the argument for the CL65 really falls apart. For around £50,000 less you can have a CL63 AMG fitted with AMG’s genuinely brilliant naturally aspirated V8.

The 63’s lighter engine means less overall mass, so the cheaper car pretty much matches the CL65’s power-to-weight ratio (it's only 0.2sec slower to 60mph).

The CL63 AMG is also more agile, more responsive and more feelsome for those drivers who recognise such things. And as you’re reading this website, I’m guessing you do.

Verdict

Mercedes CL65 AMG Still, Mercedes argues that some customers want, and will buy, the top-end CL-class coupe – even if it costs £150,000 – just because it is the top-of-the-range car. Badge one-upmanship was never the right reason to buy a car, so if you’re in the market for a CL and you don’t fancy the more characterful Bentley Continental GT or more beautiful Aston Martin DB9, buy the CL63. And a new BMW M3 with the change.

Need to know: Mercedes CL65 AMG

How much? £149,565 OTR
On sale in the UK: 2007
Engine: 5980cc twin-turbocharged V12, 612bhp @ 4800rpm, 737lb ft @ 2000rpm
Transmission: Five-speed automatic with paddle-shift, rear-wheel drive
Performance: 4.4sec 0-62mph, 155mph (limited)
How heavy/made of? 2240kg/steel
How big? (length/width/height in mm)? 5084/1871/1418
Other models in the range: CL63 AMG
Or try a... Aston Martin DB9,Bentley Continental GT

More...

Read More...

New BMW M3

New BMW M3

You’ve driven the new BMW M3 then?

Oh yes. The E92 model is the fourth generation of the M3, a car that first arrived in 1986. Back then it had a four-cylinder engine with around 200bhp. The new car doubles that with a V8 and 414bhp, but the basic ingredients remain the same: rear-wheel drive, a limited slip differential and a motorsport-inspired engine that revs to a whopping 8400rpm.

When it goes on sale in the UK in early September, the M3 will cost £50,625 and will, at first, be available only as a two-door coupe. A convertible and four-door saloon are expected to follow next year, while a Touring wagon is under evalution but less likely to make production. All in all, the broadened range will help break (hopes BMW) the 100,000-unit barrier for the first time. The last M3 – 2000’s six-cylinder E46 – is a tough act to follow, however.

So M3 grows up, gets two more cylinders. Didn’t that end in disaster last time around?

New BMW M3 Not disaster, no, but the purists weren’t pleased when the second-generation E36 arrived in 1992. But it was a brave move and something that transformed the M3 from a niche motorsport product to the international icon it is today.

The last car’s 3.2-litre six-cylinder wouldn’t meet forthcoming emissions regulations and rivals – including Audi with the RS4 and Mercedes with the C63 AMG – upped the game with V8s, leaving Munich with little option but to match them. The American market has been a big consideration too, 50 percent of all cars expected to go Stateside.

This, then, is the first time the M3 has changed significantly since 1992.

Cut to the chase man! Is it any good?

New BMW M3 Yes it is but, just like back in 1992, the E92 will leave the hardcore craving more – there’s definitely room for a hardcore CSL-style edition, more of which later. And the V8 does significantly alter the M3’s character. Where before a creamy straight-six throatiness was followed by the trademark metallic rasp towards peak rpms, now a nice woofly warble under lighter throttle loads precedes a hard-edged – if more muted – charge for the redline. The spine-tingling zinginess of the E46 car is gone, replaced by a more mature, if still exhilarating, progression.

Unsurprisingly, the quest for a high-revving engine has left a hole in the torque low down, so you need to stir that six-speed manual (the only option for now, though SMG will follow) to really get moving. The ’box is carried over from the E46 and obviously shares its characteristics: direct but a little arthritic.

Doesn’t a big V8 ruin the handling?

New BMW M3 Impressively, the new larger engine is 15kg lighter than the six-pot in the E46 thanks to clever lightweight tech. But, like the rest of the E92 range, turn-in still feels a bit dumbed down and numb. Understeer was never an issue in the last car – it just dived into a corner with razor-sharp precision. The new M3 has a little more roll on turn-in, and you can feel the loads building on the front tyre as forces increase.

Strangely, the suspension might not be entirely to blame; BMW commissioned Michelin to develop tyres specially for the M3 that feature a compound to induce mild understeer in more extreme circumstances. Quite why this is necessary we’re not sure. BMW has already fitted stability control, and the steering wheel-activated M mode allows a little oversteer while still retaining a safety net. We’d be intrigued to drive a car on regular rubber.

Tell me about the steering, ride and brakes

New BMW M3 I will. As you’d expect, less focused handling does improve the ride quality significantly with the M3 soaking up bumps much better than its predecessor ever did. There are also three (optional) cockpit-adjustable suspension settings, so you can stiffen the dampers and reduce body roll for track work. However, BMW supplied all the test cars on 18in alloys, so we’re unable to report on the lower profile – and doubtless hugely popular – 19in option.

The steering is light and impressively linear but lacks the meaty heft of its big brother, the M5, or the finely detailed feedback of a 911.

Brakes have long been an M3 weakness, but the single caliper items fitted to the test car coped admirably with high-speed runs on the tortuous Spanish mountain roads that formed our road route. They did squeak embarrassingly however, as they did on several test cars. And whether they’ll last on track we’re yet to find out – we were limited to one lap before coming back through the pits to queue for another run, allowing the stoppers to cool.

Is the E92 as easy to powerslide as its predecessors?

New BMW M3 How childish of you. Once you’re sideways the E92 is an extremely easy, progressive car to hold in a drift (see p1), but it takes a little more determination to get it there in the first place thanks to that softer, woollier front end.

The M differential once again makes an appearance – a key ingredient in making the last car so easy to slide – offering progressive power transfer from a spinning wheel to one with more grip until, under extreme duress, the diff locks completely and both tyres spin with equal ferocity.

You’ll feel it on the road, making tight hairpins a pleasure to exit on the power rather than the one-wheel bonfire that is the BMW 335i. All that extra power – nearly 80bhp up from last time – does mean the traction control intervenes more frequently, but it’s rarely intrusive and keen drivers can reduce its role with a press of the M button.

What’s the interior like?

New BMW M3 With high quality plastics and leather, intuitively laid out controls (iDrive will always have its detractors, but for the most part we like it) and sound ergonomics, the new M3 is a good place to be. In fact, it’s simply an organic evolution of the old model, something that will appeal to those turned off by the M5 and M6’s hyper-tech interiors and illuminated gearknobs.

The seats (leather and cloth as standard, or optional full leather) are geared for comfort and, though perfect in most conditions, would benefit from M5-sytle active bolsters to better grip lunatics on a mission. As before, rear legroom is nothing more than adequate so six footers sitting behind six footers will feel cramped.

Verdict

New BMW M3 The M3 has grown up and lost a little of the E46’s edge to the more weight/more power vicious circle. But BMW has no doubt judged the market perfectly. The M3 is now a genuine volume seller and, last time, accounted for 13 percent of all UK 3-series sales. The new car needs to be a brilliant all-round package, capable of pleasing those who like the idea of the badge more than what it first stood for: track-honed thrills. And it is very, very good. This car is fast, practical, well built, comfortable and safe.

But in trying to hit so many targets, the E92 leaves purists wanting. So a CSL – a lightweight, more dynamically focused special edition – is now an absolute must and should form an integral part of the range going forward, filling the niche that the original E30 once satisfied in 1986. The good news is BMW’s top brass dropped some very large hints in the press conference, so the CSL sounds like a dead cert. We’d bet on it arriving in 2010.

If you want a great all-rounder and you don’t drive everywhere at ten tenths, the new M3 won’t disappoint. But if you crave trackday thrills, hold fire for a CSL.

Need to know: New BMW M3

Engine 3999cc, 32V, V8, 414bhp @ 8300rpm, 295lb ft @ 3900rpm
Transmission Six-speed manual gearbox, rear-wheel drive, limited slip differential
Performance 0-62mph 4.8secs, , 155mph limited, 22.8mpg, 295g/km
How heavy/made of? 1655kg/Steel,carbonfibre roof
Or try a… Audi RS4, Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG

More...

Read More...